Case :Everett C. Miller, of Marlton President of New Jersey-Based Financial Services Firm Sentenced
Case study:
The wrongdoing and fraud must be one that has been committed by the organization- whereby the organization explicitly made choices for fraud- OR where individuals somehow used the organization for some kind of wrong-doing. In the latter the fraud must not be one that was committed by an employee who is in a senior leadership position in the firm.
Based on the case that’s selected, identify what the major type of crime is, with further specificity as to the subset, and if possible, the specific subset of the subset.
In other words, provide some details about what the key fraud or criminal issues are that are involved in the case.
employ full APA formatting on your sources.
Based on the case study that’s selected for the project, include 5 of the stakeholders. For each Stakeholder identify and determine and state whether each stakeholder is internal, connected/interface, or external.
Case have multiple stakeholders, make an effort to prioritize (or triage) them. Which ones are the most important or affected stakeholders? some external stakeholders are more affected than some internal or connected/interface stakeholders, so they should be identified.
Clearly identify:
Stakeholder name/title (this can be an individual or a category
Identify what type of stakeholder they are, and what makes them such.
Following the Monash University Library’s method, develop an outline for a case study of the crime. If using the Analytical Approach, where Recommendations and Implementations might not be necessary, If using the Problem-Oriented Method, in which case Recommendations and Implementations will be required.
Along with the outline explain why you selected the approach, providing the rationale for doing so.
Each section the case study should have its own title.
synopsis should briefly outline what the case study is about. At a minimum, it should include the type of organization, the type of crime, the stakeholders, and the timeframe. As the case study develops this will change to include more information.
The findings should identify the problems found in the case, such as how it was possible for the crime to take place. It should also include information on the theories relevant to the case
The discussion is a more detailed summary of the case, one that includes more information than the synopsis. need to describe the crime in more detail and explain how it affects the stakeholders
The conclusion is similar to the synopsis, but it sums up the main points of the case.
If elected to use the Problem-Oriented Method, provide recommendations and means of implementation of recommendations.
References should be included, along with any necessary appendices. The appendices could include only a list at this point.
identify which of the stakeholders writing the case study is for, and address that stakeholder in your introduction.
synopsis should be approximately 500 words.
case study should be between 1500 and 2500 words. While this appears to be a large range, it mostly depends on the case and the case study method chose to work with. Not recommended going over length, this is for a client who does not have all the time in the world to read your prose – please stick to the evidence in your empirically grounded analysis.
incorporate news reports, court records, and available corporate records (such as 10-Qs or 10-Ks)
include outline for this study.