(3.1) Outline and illustrate briefly what you take to be samples of your knowledge of language (Brook and Stainton 2000, chapter 3). Do you agree with Chomsky’s elaboration of the nature of knowledge of language as unlike other types of knowledge? If so, why (not)? What elements of knowledge of language do you find missing in Chomsky’s presentation, given your reading of Davidson? Do you agree with Davidson that knowledge of language (as he describes it) is quite special? Why (not)?
(3.2.) In chapter 2 “Knowing the External World,” Brook and Stainton end their presentation of a few arguments for anti-skepticism with Wittgenstein’s argument. Compare the latter with that suggested by Davidson (in his “The Problem of Objectivity”). Which of the arguments do you find more promising, and why? Do you see any similarities between Davidson’s argument and that hinted at by Wittgenstein in his questions? More generally, do you think skeptical arguments are more than a mere philosophical puzzle for contemporary inquiry, and if so, why?
(3.3) Present by putting in standard form one of the arguments introduced in Martin’s presentation of the sense data theory of perception (117-118). Start your analysis with the so-called argument from hallucination (or illusion), and then present your choice of criticisms by expanding on some elements of the original argument from hallucination. Be specific about what assumption(s) central to the sense data theory you find problematic, and why. Identify its role in the argument from hallucination, and on this basis give your own appraisal of it.
(3.4) Explain and illustrate one major distinction or choice of positions in epistemology which you see as having important applications to your understanding of topics or controversies in a research field of your choice, e.g., psychology, biology, indigenous studies, anthropology, sociology, fine arts, performing arts. How does your (new) use of epistemological theory help you re-think these topics? Where else would you apply ideas you first encounter in epistemology this term? Why? Williams on the value of knowledge, Mumford on organization of knowledge as based on domains
Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results
Why Choose US :
6+ years experience on custom writing
80% Return Client
Urgent 2 Hrs Delivery
Your Privacy Guaranteed
Unlimited Free Revisions
You May Also Like This:
- Language Development—The Movers and the Shakers
- Epistemology
- ACTION PLAN FOR INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGY INTO THE LANGUAGE ARTS CLASSROOM
- Language Development Interview
- The relationship between education, knowledge and society.
- Inter language Project
- Language and Power in Asian
- Language and Literacy Development
- Language and Cognitive Processes Questions
- Discourse Analysis. Language Variety
- Evidence-Based Model and Change Model Stetler Model of EBP, Iowa Model of EBP, A Model for EBP Change, ARCC Model, PARIHS, Clinical Scholar Model, John Hopkins Nursing EBP, ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation
- English remain the international language (lingua franca) in Oman for business
- Language Rich Environment
- Sociology/ living theory
- Knowledge Evidence and Practice
- nature of sin
- Presentation (The modern serial killer in the media)
- Plato’s understanding of the nature of reality and of the good life
- Jesus Christ OR Nature & Mission of the Church in the 21st century.
- Critiquing an Article
- Should marijuana be legalized for recreational use?
- Data Manipulation Language &Queries
- SOCS 185 Discuss Nature, Nurture, and Gender Identity
- Impressions of Peter Singer’s article “America’s Shame.
- effects of nature (i.e., genetic influences) and nurture (i.e., environmental influences) on human development?
- Nature of the work
- the nature and effect of estates and interests in Land Law
- philosophy questions
- Argumentation”Author Affirms Campus Hypocrisy”
- new nuclear power stations in Britain