What Sources Are Considered Acceptable/Reliable?
The majority of the information in your brochure and in your presentation must be found in “reliable sources”. [Though very frequently utilized, Wiki[anything], gardening sites, and other similar sources, are NOT considered reliable]. That being said, plant guides and gardening sites may be great sources for pictures of your plant. You may use as many sources as your group deems necessary to locate the required information, but a MINIMUM of 2 of those sources MUST be chosen from one of those listed below.
Some specific examples of acceptable/reliable sources include:
• Herbal Resources from American Botanical Council Database
• HerbMedPro Database
• Natural Medicines Database
BOTH parts of this project (written and oral) must include the following:
Products/Forms Available for Use
Dosages (These should be specific to form and patient where necessary)
Indications (Recognized/Intended Uses)
Contraindications (When Usage is Not Recommended/Is Dangerous)
Known Adverse Reactions/Side Effects
Examples of Diseases/Conditions which are aggravated/made worse by treatment
Examples of Drugs or Supplements whose effectiveness is altered (either decreased or increased) when taken at the same time
Evidence in one or more of the “reliable sources” indicating whether or not treatment with the plant product has been tested for safety and efficacy (effectiveness), and the results of such tests if they have been completed
You will also be graded on the mechanics of the project, including:
Was the brochure/fact sheet written, and the oral presentation delivered using language that is appropriate for someone with little to no medical background?
Are written portions of the project visually appealing and easy to read?
Is proper grammar/syntax used in written portions?
Are there spelling errors?
Is all information cited appropriately (including pictures)?
Are the correct number of citations used?
See grading rubric for specific assignment of points for each of the above on the written and oral parts of the assignment.
NOTE: You should be attempting to put the information you find into your own words and organizing in your own way as much as possible for this project, NOT simply copying information from a bunch of sources and pasting them all together. Citations should be done in a manner similar to how they are done for a paper. In other words, they should be listed as they are used within the brochure/fact sheet AND the presentation (if any part of it is electronic), not simply added as a list at the back. I should not have to guess where you found a particular piece of information! (I DO check sources when grading, so it is in your best interest to make that task as simple as possible).
While this should go without saying, the work that your group submits should be “original”. Do not turn in someone else’s work as your own, and do not turn in work that has been used for other assignments (even if you originally completed the other assignment). I take academic honesty seriously, and will not hesitate to turn in any group to the Honor Code Panel that I suspect has not done their own work!
Grading Rubric/Grade Sheet:
Brochure/Fact Sheet Oral Presentation
Pts Earned Pts Possible Pts Earned Pts Possible
Products Available 2 2
Dosages 2 2
Indications 2 2
Contraindications 2 2
Drug Interactions 2 2
Disease Interactions 2 2
Side Effects 2 2
Is it Safe? 1 1
Does it Work? 1 1
Visually Appealing? 1 1
Audience Appropriate? 1 1
Easy to Read? 1 1
Grammar/Syntax 1 1
Spelling 1 1
Appropriate Citations? 1 1
Minimum # of Reliable Sources Cited? 1 1
Originality of Presentation 2
Appropriate Speed/Length
(~15 minutes) 1
Appropriate Eye Contact 1
Total Score = __________/50
Do you want your assignment written by the best essay experts? Then look no further. Our team of experienced writers are on standby to deliver to you a quality written paper as per your specified instructions. Order Now, and enjoy an amazing discount!!
You May Also Like This:
- Danielle L. McGuire, At the Dark End of the Street: Black Women, Rape, and Resistance—A New History of the Civil Rights Movement from Rosa Parks to the Rise of Black Power.
- NR443 Week 6: Direct Care Project Part 4: Evaluating the Project
- The Human Mindset and how it creates our Reality
- NR443-14471 Week 4: Direct Care Project Part 2 For this part of the direct care project, you will be creating a PowerPoint presentation based on the topic and problem identified in Part 1. If you chose air quality as your topic, you will present on the Air Quality Flag Program. If you chose substance use, you will present the SBIRT intervention model.
- Understanding the role of project management methodologies and technologies to improve project success rate in Construction or IT
- Course Project: Community Advocacy Project—Local Government
- NR443 Week 4: Direct Care Project Part 2: Planning the Presentation
- WBS (MS Project or open source equivalent)
- The continual rise of young boys of black / African heritage being excluded from secondary school
- Project Management (Mature Project Management at Borsch Gruppe)
- Horse History Project Summarize Sources
- A Study of Student Evaluations of African American Faculty at a Historically Black College/ University
- Project Management Plan PMP
- Work-based Project Plan – Project Management
- I Wear the Black Hat
- CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
- history project
- NR443 Week 2: Direct Care Project Part 1: Assessment and Diagnosis
- Project Scheduling
- Course Project: Community Advocacy Project—Health Policies
- Management of Project Risk, Quality and Safety
- Risk Management on a Satellite Development Project
- End of term exam ( Black Studies)
- Interstellar Travel via Black Holes and Wormholes
- Physical Activity Resource Brochure/infographic. Peers, Fun and unusual, accessible activity
- RESEARCH DEFINITION/ARGUMENT PROJECT
- separating ‘fact’ from ‘fiction’ in contemporary climate change debates
- APN Leader Interview Project
- Planning a Software Development Project
- Report about banking systems for loans.