Articles review ( two articles ) each about 4 pages
The key to this assignment is to apply the what you have learn in this course to the evaluation of a research article.
You must do this analysis by answering the specific questions listed below.
PLEASE NUMBER THE SECTIONS OF YOUR REVIEW TO CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBER OF MY QUESTIONS.
NOTE: Make sure that the full citation is either printed or written on your photocopy or you will not get credit for the review. Attach the photocopy to your review. I simply cannot grade your review without the photocopy.
Section 1 : Give a brief summary about the article ( 1 page Summary ) – ( 3 marks )
Section 2: ( 8 marks )
1. What is the problem or question(s) this research concerns? You should be able to identify the central focus. If there are additional secondary problems, identify these too. (1-4 sentences).
2. What is the source of the data? (That is, questionnaire, intensive interview etc….) In some studies there are two or more sources of data. Give a brief overview of how the data were acquired. (2-5 sentences)
3. Briefly, what do the key findings turn out to be? (1-5 sentences)
4. Give the following information about the sampling procedures in outline form, saying “not given,” if it is not:
a. Definition of the population of theoretical or substantive interest; a) What is the population of theoretical or substantive interest; that is, to whom does the author seem to want to be able to generalize?
b. Geographic areas, organizational units (e.g. what state, University, county), or other primary sampling units and how these were chosen.
c. The sampling units (e.g. people, organizations, etc…).
d. Response rate (e.g., to a mailed survey) and sample size.
e. Does the author discuss any shortcoming in the sample or the sampling procedures? If so, what does s/he say?
5) Summarize any discussion by the author(s) of why this is a good measure or of what its problems are, including statistics done in the article.
6) Give your own evaluation of how good you think this article is, explaining your reasons.
SECTION 3: Overall Evaluation ( 5 marks)
1. Give your overall evaluation of the methods used in this article: what things were done well? what were done poorly? How much trust do you put in the findings? ( 2 Marks)
2. To sum up, what do you feel you’ve learned worth knowing from this article? (If your answer is “nothing”, explain why.) (Please note: this question is about the article and refers to the quality of information it contains.) ( 2 Marks)
3. Tell me anything you would like me to know about your experiences doing this analysis, or any suggestions you have for future revisions of this assignment. ( 1 Mark )
total 8 pages each article 4 pages
– i will attach the article
Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results
Why Choose US
6+ years experience on custom writing
80% Return Client
Urgent 2 Hrs Delivery
Your Privacy Guaranteed
Unlimited Free Revisions
