Read the integrative research review article by Militello, Kelly, and Melnyk (2012) “Systematic Review of Text-Messaging Interventions to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Pediatric and Adolescent Populations: Implications for Clinical Practice and Research”. Then complete a three to four page analysis and critique paper, 750 words. In this critique you will complete both the Synopsis and Credibility components from pages 393-396 of your textbook, Appendix D: “Completed Appraisal of Conclusions of an Integrative Research Review” .
Title your page with the following heading:
Citation: Militello, L.K., Kelly, S.A., & Melnyk, B. M. (2012). Systematic Review of Text-Messaging Interventions to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Pediatric and Adolescent Populations: Implications for Clinical Practice and Research. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 9 (2), 66-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00239.x.
Synopsis
1. What topic or question did the integrative research review address?
2. How were potential individual research reports identified?
3. What determined if a study was included in the analysis?
4. How many studies were included in the review?
5. What research designs were used in the selected research studies?
6. What were the consistent and important across-studies conclusions?
Credibility
7. Was the topic clearly defined?
8. Is there a description of the methods used to conduct the review?
9. Was the search for study reports comprehensive and unbiased?
10. Were the studies included in the review assessed for quality?
11. Were the design characteristics and the findings of the studies displayed or discussed in sufficient detail?
12. Was there truly an integration (synthesis) of findings – not merely reporting of findings from each study?
13. If different findings were found between studies, did the reviewers explore why differences in findings might have occurred?
14. Did the reviewers distinguish between conclusions based on consistent findings from a sufficient number of studies and those based on inferior evidence?
15. Which conclusions were supported by consistent findings from two or more studies?
16. Are the conclusions credible?
Looking for the best essay writer? Click below to have a customized paper written as per your requirements.
You May Also Like This:
- Nursing qualitative review
- Health Care Research Analysis and Utilization Critique of Research Studies
- The importance of wellness programs in driving employee behaviors
- Journal Review Submission
- The Systematic Evaluation of Alogliptin’s (Nesina) Cost-Effectiveness in Treating Type 2 Diabetes
- Research Utilization (Research/Evidence-based Practice/Global Health) Paper
- Research Article Review
- Journal Article Critique
- post 15 Topic: Article review Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Article Review
- Adolescent development
- 4MAT Review
- Methodological Issues Article Review
- Marketing Plan for Healthy Fast Food Restaurant
- Caring for Populations:Assessment and Diagnosis
- Research Summary table
- Nursing Interventions for Family Members Waiting During Cardiac Procedures
- Literature Review:Body
- Introduction to epidemiology
- review of the literature
- Analyzing Health Disparities in Populations at Higher Risk for HIV
- Systematic Educational Evaluation
- Empirical Article Summary & Review
- 4MAT Review McMinn, M. R. (2011). Psychology, theology, and spirituality in Christian counseling (Rev. ed.). Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House. ISBN: 9780842352529.
- Strategies in the assisted living facility to promote ego integrity for the residents for group and individual activities
- Analyzing, critiquing, and summarizing an original research article.
- Formal movie review
- Culminating Assignment: Observation Paper – CHOA’s Pediatric Robotic Rehabilitation
- CHOA’s Pediatric Robotic Rehabilitation
- Hotel Service Quality Improvement through Measuring the Guest & Staff Experiences
- Middle Childhood