#3
After you have fully read the case, complete a stakeholder analysis just as you did for the first case. When you identify the stakeholders, make sure that you discuss each stakeholder and his/her interests. Place the analysis within the text of your essay.
On page four of the case under “Instructions, you will find four different “courses of action” to take in response to the case. Identify which course you would take, and why. Remember to incorporate course materials.
Continue the analysis by identifying the other ethical issues such as corporate social responsibility, integrity, reputation, bias, or corruption among others. Analyze those issues using the facts of the case and the ideas from the authors whom we have read.
Be sure to give credit to the authors whose work you are relying upon. All authors, including from our reading list, must be credited! In text citations (APA) or footnotes (MLA) formats are equally acceptable. When in doubt, make sure you give credit!
Be complete and thorough. For example, if you choose to discuss corporate social responsibility, be sure to refer to the authors and their ideas specifically – don’t rely on the reader to guess whom you are discussing.
Your essay should be 4-7 pages in length, double-spaced, or thereabouts. This is just a guideline – it is not a requirement. Please review your paper for any errors in spelling, sentence structure, grammar, word choices and logic. Compare your paper against the rubric to make sure it is sound structurally (format) and substantively (content). Writing errors result in a loss of points.
Rubric for Analysis Paper #3
Criteria Level 0 Unsatisfactory
0-1 Level 1 Unsatisfactory
1-2 Level 2 Satisfactory
2-3 Level 3 Excellent
4-5 Total
Identifies Stakeholders Identification of relevant stakeholders is sparse or missing. Identifies some of the relevant stakeholders in a given problem/case. Some important stakeholders are missing. Identifies most of the relevant stakeholders in a given problem/case. Most important stakeholders are identified. Completely and thoughtfully identifies all relevant and important stakeholders in a given problem/case.
Identifies Ethical Concerns Identification of ethical /social concerns is sparse or missing. Identifies some of the ethical/social concerns in a given problem/case. Some important points are missing. Identifies most of the ethical/social concerns in a given problem/case. Most significant points are identified. Completely and thoughtfully identifies all ethical/social concerns in a given problem/case.
Supports Arguments in Stakeholder Analysis Inconsistent or lacking in articulation of why identified stakeholders are relevant to the problem. Some important points are missing and/or support for inclusion of stakeholders lacks substantial explanation. Able to support inclusion of stakeholders with adequate explanation and few logical fallacies. Able to support a inclusion of stakeholders with a substantial amount of explanation and no logical fallacies.
Supports Arguments in Ethical Analysis Inconsistent in articulation of position and/or offers little or no supporting evidence. Most points are supported with adequate information. Some important points are missing and/or support for positions lacks substantial explanation. Able to support a position with adequate information and few logical fallacies. Able to support a position with a substantial amount of information, little or no bias, and valid arguments.
Connects Analyses to Recommended Actions Analyses don’t inform or lead to recommended actions. Analyses somewhat inform recommended actions, but linkages are not always clear. Analyses directly inform and lead to recommended actions.
Structure & Language Errors are so numerous that they obscure meaning. Occasional errors in writing, but they don’t represent a major distraction. Writing is free or almost free of errors.
Total Score
(possible 30)
For a custom paper on the above topic, place your order now!
What We Offer:
• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level writers
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% money-back guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written paper
You May Also Like This:
- walmart company
- Research Analysis Paper
- Stakeholder Analysis
- Undergrad Paper Critique on Peer-Reviewed Biology Research Paper
- Analysis of CSR approach in different countries CSR
- Making Ethical Decisions
- Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas
- SOCIAL WELFARE POLICY PAPER
- Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists
- Formal Analysis Paper
- Reading Research Literature
- Extra Credit American and Mexico History
- Values and Planning in Social Care
- International Finance——Mexico
- Term Paper – Operations Management – Nike
- Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals
- ORGANISATIONAL PROBLEM ANALYSIS
- Complete a plan for a social media needs assessment of your organization.
- Environmental Sustainability at Walmart
- Trompenaars Analysis – Replies
- Software Industry Analysis Including an analysis on Intuit, Inc.
- Nursing Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper
- Ethical Analysis – Strategy
- Social Media Needs Assessment
- Cilkray Graphics case analysis
- Critically evaluate how useful the undertaking of a “strategic position” analysis may be for an organisation
- CUSTOMIZED LEARNING THEORY PAPER – FINAL PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
- research paper #1Research Paper # 1
- critical analysis
- paper