The LOs for this module are as follows.
1. Identify and select sources of data and information
2. Analyze and present information to support decision making
3. Communicate results of information analysis and decision
4. Comprehend the range of tools and techniques available as support for managerial decision making

This assignment should be completed with reference to the WM Pressings Case Study and the OIL Project.

This assignment requires you to write a 2,000-word assignment submission answering the following questions:
1. Explain the limitations of using heuristics to carry out decision making with multiple objectives.
2. Using the SMART process for decision making with multiple objectives, carry out an analysis on the information given in the case about the press refurbishment and identify which of the four companies lie on the efficient frontier.
3. Based on your answer to (2) above, provide your recommendation on which of the four companies should be chosen to carry out the work, providing justification for your decision. There is no need to carry out sensitivity analysis.
4. Using relevant information from the WM Pressings Case Study and other sources, critically analyze the role that making decisions in an ethical manner can play in enabling businesses to be successful.
5. Using relevant examples from the OIL project, reflect on your learning of various tools and objectives used for decision making.
WM Pressings Case Study

WM Pressings1 is a manufacturing company based in Coventry in England. The company makes small pressed steel and aluminum parts for customers in the automotive industry.
The company has recently experienced a marked deterioration in its quality performance, with a significant rise in the number of defective components being returned to the company from its customers. As a result, an in-depth investigation has been carried out, which has led to the identification of the main root cause of the issue, which is now known to lie with one of the presses that the company uses to manufacture its components. The company has ten presses in all, and it is “Press No’2” that has been found to be responsible for the largest proportion of the defective components being made.
A multi-functional team (comprising company experts from the production, quality and maintenance departments) has been looking at solutions to the issue and has concluded that Press No.2 does not need to be replaced, however it does need to be given a complete refurbishment. It is outside the scope of the expertise of the staff at WM Pressings to carry out this work, so an external refurbishment company will need to be appointed.

Appointment of External Refurbishment Company
Four companies have been contacted and asked to quote to carry out the refurbishment work, and quotes have been received from each one; Arndale, Bell Mechanical, Calthorpe Tooling, and Drystone.
In addition, the multi-functional team described above has reconvened and carried out an analysis of the four companies, focusing on four key factors;
1. Reliability. By researching available data on past performance (both within and outside WM Pressings) it was possible to develop a measure for expected press reliability.
2. Performance. By analyzing each of the quotes, it was possible to create a measure for performance, based to the output levels planned to be achieved.
3. Changeover time. The companies were asked to find innovative solutions that would improve the ease & speed of changing from one die to another, when switching production from one component to another.
4. Environmental performance. The companies were asked to consider ways in which they can reduce the consumption of electricity and any other eco-friendly features.

Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results

Why Choose US

6+ years experience on custom writing
80% Return Client
Urgent 2 Hrs Delivery
Your Privacy Guaranteed
Unlimited Free Revisions