Details:
This assignment is based on the previous assignment # 81544573: Title: “Importance of Nursing Intervention over Convectional care in Management of Diabetes Type 2” I change the title to:
“Nursing Intervention compare to Conventional care in Patients with type 2 Diabetes”
Here the picot question that was used in assignment # 81544573: In patients diagnosed with diabetes (P) how does nursing intervention (I) compared to conventional care (C) improve patient recovery (O) within one year (T).

Based on the previous assignment # 81544573
Appraise each resource using the “Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists,” Please work the assignment # 81544573 to DO THE APRAISAL the questions below.

Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic
Reviews of Clinical Intervention Studies

1. Are the Results of the Review Valid?
A. Are the studies contained in the review randomized controlled trials? Yes No

B. Does the review include a detailed description of the search strategy to find all relevant studies?
Yes/ No

C. Does the review describe how validity of the individual studies was assessed (e.g., methodological quality, including the use of random assignment to study groups and complete follow-up of the subjects)?
Yes /No

D. Were the results consistent across studies? Yes/ No
E. Were individual patient data or aggregate data used in the analysis? Yes/ No

2. What Were the Results?

A. How large is the intervention or treatment effect (OR, RR, effect size, level of significance)?

B. How precise is the intervention or treatment (CI)?

3. Will the Results Assist Me in Caring for My Patients?

A. Are my patients similar to the ones included in the review? Yes /No

B. Is it feasible to implement the fi ndings in my practice setting? Yes/ No

C. Were all clinically important outcomes considered, including risks and benefits of the treatment?
Yes/ No

D. What is my clinical assessment of the patient and are there any contraindications or circumstances that would inhibit me from implementing the treatment?
Yes/No

E. What are my patient’s and his or her family’s preferences and values about the treatment that is under consideration?
Yes/ No

Write a narrative of 750-1000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:
1. Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
2. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
3. Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.
It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.
Submit the evaluation table and check list you design designed with the narrative, Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines. Abstract is not required.
Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies.
Use the evaluation table template. Use the summary table to be more concise in the narrative.
Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table.
HERE THE EVALUATION TABLE TEMPLATE FORMAT TO USE
BELOW (NEXT PAGE)
Write a narrative of 750-1000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:
4. Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
5. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
6. Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.
It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.
Submit the evaluation table and check list you design designed with the narrative, Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines. Abstract is not required.

Do you want your assignment written by the best essay experts? Then look no further. Our team of experienced writers are on standby to deliver to you a quality written paper as per your specified instructions. Order Now, and enjoy an amazing discount!!